In this section we will discuss the status of the HET facility and each instrument and any limitation to configurations that occurred during the period.
Commissioning and Engineering Report There were 128
hours granted for engineering in the 20-2 period:
There were 64 hours of engineering used (charged) in the 20-2
period, in the following categories:
In 20-2 the engineering, commissioning, and GTO requests were
again collected by the Science Operations Manager, and presented
to the board. After the board approved these "off the top"
allocations, the Science Operations Manager determined the TAC
allocations and notified the TAC chairs at each partner
institution, as described in the "Institution Status" section.
Month by Month Summary
The following table gives the observing statistics for each month. Column A gives the fraction of the month that was spent attempting science (as opposed to engineering or instrument commissioning). Science time is defined to begin at 18 degree evening twilight and end at 18 degree morning twilight. Column B gives the fraction of the possible science time (A) lost due to weather. The other columns give the amount of remaining science time (after removing weather losses) not spent attempting science targets. Please note that the first stack of the night often occurs before 18 degree twilight.
Month | A: Fraction of the Time that was Possible Science |
B: Fraction of Total Time Lost due to Weather *now w/ rej targ |
C: Fraction of Actual Science Time Spent with Shutter Open |
D: Fraction of Actual Science Time Lost due to Overhead |
E: Fraction of Actual Science Time Lost due to Alignment |
F: Fraction of Actual Science Time Lost due to Problems |
G: Fraction of Actual Science Time Not accounted for or Lost |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr |
0.906 |
0.372 |
0.664 |
0.266 |
0.0314 |
0.0388 |
0.0000 |
May |
0.846 |
0.279 |
0.645 |
0.268 |
0.0754 |
0.0120 |
0.0000 |
Jun |
0.882 |
0.430 |
0.625 |
0.262 |
0.0589 |
0.0542 |
0.0000 |
Jul |
0.879 |
0.487 |
0.626 |
0.283 |
0.0491 |
0.0415 |
0.0000 |
The following tables give a break down of all attempted science visits as well as the category that each falls into.
Charged exposures | ||
---|---|---|
Number of Times | Shutter Open (Hours) | Type |
2661 |
366.52 |
A - Acceptable |
87 |
17.70 |
B - Acceptable but Border line conditions |
149 |
44.78 |
4 - Priority 4 visits (does not include 1/2 charge) |
0 |
0.0 | Q - charged but PI error |
0 | 0.0 | C - Acceptable by RA but PI rejects |
Uncharged exposures caught by RA | ||
---|---|---|
Number of Times | Shutter Open (Hours) | Type |
3 |
0.52 |
N - Rejected due to unknown cause |
6 |
1.98 |
E - Rejected for Equipment Failure |
198 |
44.47 |
W - Rejected for Weather |
5 |
1.27 | H - Rejected for Human failure |
Uncharged exposures caught by PI | ||
---|---|---|
Number of Times | Shutter Open (Hours) | Type |
20 |
6.62 |
P - Rejected for weather |
0 | 0.0 | F - Rejected for Equipment Failure |
0 | 0.0 | T - Rejected for poor track choice |
0 | 0.0 | X - Rejected for Human failure |
Acceptable but Uncharged exposures | ||
---|---|---|
Number of Times | Shutter Open (Hours) | Type |
0 |
0.0 | I - Targets observed under otherwise idle conditions |
The following setup statistics include slew, acquisition, and starting data collection script. The table below gives the average setup time for each instrument PER ACTUAL VISIT and the average and maximum COMPLETED charged science exposures and visits.
The "Exposure" is defined by when the (CCD) shutter opens and closes. A "Visit" is the requested total CCD shutter open time during a track and might be made up of several "Exposures". "Visit" as defined here contains no overhead. To calculate one type of observing efficiency metric one might divide the "Visit" by the sum of "Visit" + "Overhead".
The average setup per visit is calculated from acceptable
priority 0-3 (not borderline) science targets. This number
reflects how quickly we can move from object to object on average
for each instrument, however, this statistic tends to weight the
setup for programs with large number of targets.
The average overhead percentage is calculated for each instrument
and shows how much of that instrument's total time on sky
(overhead+exposure) was overhead. NB: LRS2 has the smallest
overhead %, but typical LRS2 observations use much longer
exposures than VIRUS, even though VIRUS has a faster average setup
time.
Instrument | Avg Setup per Visit (min) |
Total time exposed (hrs) |
Overhead % |
---|---|---|---|
VIRUS | 4.38 | 166.6 |
23.43% |
LRS2 | 7.97 |
47.25 |
31.93% |
HPF | 7.29 |
107.73 |
33.31% |
The setup statistics can be shortened by multiple setups (each
one counted as a separate visit) while on the same target such as
moving from LRS2-B to LRS2-R.
HETDEX time interruptions:
Within the times when HETDEX shots were available on-sky for >20 minutes, the following percentages summarize how the time was used:
Overall time charged: 376.7h (science/GTO) + 103.5h (eng) = 480.2h
Total estimated science time available (in TAC time
determinations): 500.7h
In the table below we show the breakdown of the charged time for each program submitted. The "Total %" is the completion of the entire TAC time including P4 time. The last four columns show the completion rate for targets submitted in each priority bin. This completion rate is the greater of the targets completed percentage and the TAC allocation completed percentage in each priority bin.
Institution | Tot exp |
Tot OH |
Tot Chrg | Tot TAC | Total % | P0 Completion |
P1 Completion | P2 Completion | P3 Completion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||
G20-2-001 | 0.40 | 0.15 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 55% | 100% |
0% |
||
G20-2-002 | 0.39 | 0.06 |
0.45 | 0.50 |
90% | 90% |
|||
M20-2-002 | 1.28 |
0.39 |
1.67 |
3.90 |
43% |
100% |
100% |
0% |
|
M20-2-003 | 0.96 |
0.67 |
1.63 |
5.60 |
29% |
79% |
76% |
0% |
|
M20-2-004 | 0.83 |
0.32 |
1.15 |
1.00 |
100% |
100% |
|||
PSU20-2-001 | 2.63 |
0.59 |
3.21 |
2.67 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
PSU20-2-002 | 0.33 |
0.15 |
0.48 | 0.53 | 91% | 100% | |||
PSU20-2-003 | 2.17 |
0.28 |
2.45 |
2.66 |
92% |
100% |
100% |
||
PSU20-2-004 | 2.10 |
0.42 |
2.52 |
2.50 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
PSU20-2-005 | 0.08 |
0.00 |
0.08 |
0.54 |
15%(P4) |
|
|||
PSU20-2-006 | 2.11 |
0.50 |
2.61 |
2.67 |
82.5% |
100% |
100% |
||
PSU20-2-007 | 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.84 |
0%(P4) |
||||
PSU20-2-008 | 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.33 |
0%(P4,NT) |
||||
PSU20-2-009 | 0.13 |
0.00 |
0.13 |
1.00 |
13%(P4) |
||||
PSU20-2-010 | 23.63 |
5.89 |
29.52 |
30.00 |
98% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
UT20-2-002 | 0.17 |
0.00 |
0.17 |
2.00 |
8%(P4) |
||||
UT20-2-003 | 2.76 |
0.69 |
3.45 |
10.00 |
25% |
100% |
100% TD |
||
UT20-2-004 | 4.08 |
0.87 |
4.95 |
18.00 |
28% |
90% |
|||
UT20-2-005 | 0.25 |
0.00 |
0.25 |
2.00 |
13%(P4) |
||||
UT20-2-006 | 7.29 |
3.09 |
10.38 |
20.60 |
50% |
95% |
|||
UT20-2-007 | 21.34 |
4.80 |
26.14 |
33.00 |
79% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
UT20-2-008 | 10.80 |
3.85 |
14.65 |
32.00 |
46% |
100% |
100% |
33% |
|
UT20-2-009 | 8.93 |
0.00 |
8.93 |
15.00 |
60%(P4) |
||||
UT20-2-010 | 11.67 |
6.42 |
18.09 |
31.70 |
57% |
100% |
|||
UT20-2-011 | 30.40 |
8.45 |
38.85 |
56.40 |
69% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
UT20-2-012 | 2.43 |
1.36 |
3.79 |
7.40 |
51% |
100% |
|||
UT20-2-013 | 1.83 |
0.00 |
1.83 |
2.00 |
92%(P4) |
||||
UT20-2-014 | 1.27 |
0.71 |
1.98 |
2.00 |
99% |
100% |
100% |
||
HET20-2-100 | 130.80 |
48.08 |
178.88* |
187.00 |
96% |
100% |
|||
HET20-2-201 | 5.50 | 0.75 | 6.25 | 6.37 | 98% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
HET20-2-202 | 2.67 |
0.97 |
3.63 |
3.63 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
||
HET20-2-300 | 15.67 |
4.27 |
19.94 |
20.00 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
HET20-2-400 | 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
17.50 |
0% |
NT |
|||
Institution | Tot. Open |
Tot OH |
Tot Chrg |
Tot TAC |
Total % |
P0 completion |
P1 completion |
P2 completion |
P3 completion |
NT = no (or very late-in-trimester)targets
submitted at this priority (even though time was allocated)
HC = HETDEX conflict (targets submitted were in
direct competition with HETDEX; PI was aware of issue)
SI = Seasonally inappropriate (target had limited
availability during trimester because of twilights)
TD = Time Domain targets (either none submitted or
submitted targets unreachable due to weather)
* = HETDEX nominal exposures+overhead at 178.88h but
total on-sky time was 187.0h due to OCD's exposure extensions
Program Completion Rates | |||
---|---|---|---|
Priority | Average Completion | Median Completion | |
P0 | 100.0% | 100% | |
P1 | 98.2% | 100% | |
P2 | 91.7% | 100% | |
P3 | 71.8% | 98% |
Below we show how the TAC allocations were
determined.
quantity |
Apr (hrs) |
May (hrs) |
Jun (hrs) |
Jul (hrs) |
Total (hrs) |
18deg-18deg |
248.20 |
224.58 |
199.88 |
215.15 |
887.82 |
Weather-insensitive engineering time |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
20.00 |
"Operational" time |
243.20 |
219.58 |
194.88 |
210.15 |
867.82 |
Weather loss frac. | 0.320 |
0.320 |
0.380 |
0.480 |
|
Efficiency loss frac. (align+PRs) |
0.081 |
0.081 |
0.089 |
0.100 |
|
"Clear science" time |
152.43 |
138.23 |
110.78 |
99.30 |
500.74 |
Com/Eng/GTO time |
323.00 |
||||
"Allowed" hours given to TACs for science |
177.74 |
(note that HETDEX's allocation of 185h was later increased to
187h in July 2020 by the HET Board)
Partner |
Share |
Notes |
Total hours allowed |
Goettingen |
0.0085 |
1.49 |
|
Munich |
0.0590 |
10.49 |
|
PSU |
0.2568 |
time trade: 92.24 - 4.75 |
40.89 |
UT |
0.6757 |
time trade: 242.70 + 4.75 |
124.85 |
This is how each institution had
allocated its time by priority in the 20-2 trimester.
Time Allocation by Institution (hours) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Institution | Priority 0 | Priority 1 | Priority 2 | Priority 3 | Priority 4 | Total P0-P3 |
Frac. of allowed |
Goettingen | - |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
- |
1.50 |
100.0% |
Munich | 0.90 |
2.60 |
3.50 |
3.50 |
- |
10.50 |
100.0% |
PSU | 3.33 |
11.03 |
13.33 |
13.34 |
3.21 |
41.03 |
100.3% |
UT | 10.40 |
32.00 |
42.10 |
42.16 |
110.00 |
127.10 |
101.8% |
Other allocations | |||||||
GTO | 210.5 | 12.00 | 12.00 | - |
- |
234.5 |
100.0% |
Notes:
1) PSU intentionally over-allocated their P0 and P1 time; in early
July the time charged exceeded its time allowed at P2 and P3 and
therefore all remaining high-priority time was prematurely
deactivated
2) UT also over-allocated its time, but its time charged did not
exceed the time allowed
As requested by the board the time accounting has started over starting Fiscal year 2011-2012.
Time Charged by Institution (hours) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
-INST- | Hours charged this period (% allowed) |
% of all this period |
Total hours charged to date including 20-2 |
% of all to date including 20-2 |
Partner shares in 20-2 |
Goettingen | 1.00 (67%) |
0.6% |
185.58 |
3.6% |
0.84% |
Munich | 4.45 (42%) |
2.5% |
249.45 |
4.8% |
5.90% |
PSU | 41.01 (100%) |
22.8% |
1480.08 |
28.4% |
25.68% |
UT | 133.46 (107%) |
74.2% |
3301.46 |
63.3% |
67.57% |
Below are the summaries of the Guaranteed Time Observations (GTO) programs granted by the Board:
GTO and Special Time Charged by Project (hours) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Project | Allocated in 20-2 |
Allocated total to date including 20-2 |
Charged in 20-2 |
Charged total to date including 20-2 |
|
HETDEX (HETYY-P-100) | 187.0 | 1666.0 | 178.88 | 1125.3* | |
LRS2 GTO (HETYY-P-2XX) | 10.0 | 145.94 | 10.00 | 75.61 | |
HPF GTO (HETYY-P-3XX) | 20.0 | 120.40 | 19.94 |
121.37 | |
GW (HETYY-P-400) | 17.5 | 70.00 |
0.00 |
12.37 |
(Totals to date start from the 11-2 period)
SJ, Aug 7 2020