HET End-Trimester Report
Third Period of 2021
August 1 - November 30

This report is composed of five sections:
Facility Status

In this section we will discuss the status of the HET facility and each instrument and any limitation to configurations that occurred during the period.



Probe and instrument availability statistics:
There were a total of 123 nights in the trimester:
LRS2-B
LRS2-R
VIRUS
HPF
HPF
LFC
HPF
high-prec.
Guider 1
Guider 2
WFS 1
WFS 2
DIMM
123
123
123
113
122
112
123
123
79
123
123
100%
100% 100% 92%
99%
91%
100% 100% 64%
100% 100%



Observing Statistics

Commissioning, Engineering, and Guaranteed Time Report There were 245.5 hours granted in the 21-3 period:

There were 225.9 hours of eng/comm/GTO used (charged) in the 21-3 period, in the following categories:

This was one of our best trimesters in terms of utilization of Comm/Eng/GTO time, driven by HETDEX achieving 99% completion of its time allocation.




Month by Month Summary

The following table gives the observing statistics for each month. Column A gives the fraction of the month that was spent attempting science (as opposed to engineering or instrument commissioning). Science time is defined to begin at 18 degree evening twilight and end at 18 degree morning twilight. Column B gives the fraction of the possible science time (A) lost due to weather. The other columns give the amount of remaining science time (after removing weather losses) not spent attempting science targets. Please note that the first stack of the night often occurs before 18 degree twilight.

Month A:
Fraction of the Time that was Possible Science
B:
Fraction of Total Time Lost due to Weather
C:
Fraction of Actual Science Time Spent with Shutter Open
D:
Fraction of Actual Science Time Lost due to Overhead
E:
Fraction of Actual Science Time Lost due to Alignment
F:
Fraction of Actual Science Time Lost due to Problems
G:
Fraction of Actual Science Time Not accounted for or Lost
Aug 0.963
0.510
0.666
0.282
0.0455
0.0065
0.0000
Sep
0.944
0.391
0.644
0.286
0.0273
0.0426
0.0000
Oct
0.955
0.220
0.682
0.265
0.0176
0.0362
0.0000
Nov
0.986
0.389
0.671
0.252
0.0322
0.0456
0.0000

The following tables give a break down of all attempted science visits as well as the category that each falls into.

Charged exposures
Number of Times Shutter Open (Hours) Type
3635
526.80
A - Acceptable
59
14.70
B - Acceptable but Border line conditions
470
129.23
4 - Priority 4 visits (does not include 1/2 charge)
0
0.0 Q - charged but PI error
0 0.0 C - Acceptable by RA but PI rejects

Uncharged exposures caught by RA
Number of Times Shutter Open (Hours) Type
0
0.00
N - Rejected due to unknown cause
23
4.82
E - Rejected for Equipment Failure
228
52.77
W - Rejected for Weather
27
6.03
H - Rejected for Human Errors

Uncharged exposures caught by PI
Number of Times Shutter Open (Hours) Type
15
4.45
P - Rejected for weather
0
0.00 F - Rejected for Equipment Failure
4
0.95 T - Rejected for poor track choice
0
0.00 X - Rejected for Human failure

Acceptable but Uncharged exposures
Number of Times Shutter Open (Hours) Type
0
0.0 I - Targets observed under otherwise idle conditions

The following setup statistics include slew, acquisition, and starting data collection script. The table below gives the average setup time for each instrument PER ACTUAL VISIT and the average and maximum COMPLETED charged science exposures and visits.

The "Exposure" is defined by when the (CCD) shutter opens and closes. A "Visit" is the requested total CCD shutter open time during a track and might be made up of several "Exposures". "Visit" as defined here contains no overhead. To calculate one type of observing efficiency metric one might divide the "Visit" by the sum of "Visit" + "Overhead".

The average setup per visit is calculated from acceptable priority 0-3 (not borderline) science targets. This number reflects how quickly we can move from object to object on average for each instrument, however, this statistic tends to weight the setup for programs with large number of targets.

The average overhead percentage is calculated for each instrument and shows how much of that instrument's total time on sky (overhead+exposure) was overhead. NB: LRS2 has the smallest overhead %, but typical LRS2 observations use much longer exposures than VIRUS, even though VIRUS has a faster average setup time.



Instrument Avg Setup per Visit
(min)
Total time exposed
(hrs)
Overhead
%
VIRUS 4.48
133.45
24.80%
LRS2 5.79
98.40
29.49%
HPF 6.81
214.27
30.68%

The setup statistics can be shortened by multiple setups (each one counted as a separate visit) while on the same target such as moving from LRS2-B to LRS2-R.


HETDEX time interruptions:

Within the times when HETDEX shots were available on-sky for >20 minutes, the following percentages summarize how the time was used:



Overall time charged: 225.9 (eng/comm/GTO) + 394.17h (sci) = 620.07h
Total estimated science time available (in TAC time determinations): 609.54h
   Conclusion: weather in 21-3 was slightly better than expected, resulting in high completion rates across programs/priorities.




Observing Programs Status

In the table below we show the breakdown of the charged time for each program submitted. The "Total %" is the completion of the entire TAC time including P4 time. The last four columns show the completion rate for targets submitted in each priority bin. This completion rate is the greater of the targets completed percentage and the TAC allocation completed percentage in each priority bin.

Institution Tot exp
Tot OH
Tot Chrg Tot TAC Total % P0 Completion
P1 Completion P2 Completion P3 Completion










G21-3-001 0.21
0.10
0.31
0.33
94%


100%
G21-3-002 11.20
3.20
14.40
13.77
105%
100%
100%
100% 100%










M21-3-001 7.31
2.68
9.99
7.60
131%
100%
100%
100%
100%
M21-3-002 2.92
0.90
3.82
4.00
95%

100%
100%

M21-3-003 3.26
1.53
4.79
7.20
67%

100%
100%
22% (HC)
M21-3-004 1.65
0.50
2.15
2.00
108%
100%













PSU21-3-001 2.58
0.63
3.22
7.87
41%(P4)

100% 100%
100%
PSU21-3-002 0.09
0.13
0.22
0.26 83%

100%


PSU21-3-003 5.81
0.00
5.81
6.33
92%(P4)




PSU21-3-004 6.30
2.11
8.41
8.53
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
PSU21-3-005 3.68
0.93
4.61
5.05
91%



100%
PSU21-3-006 1.25
0.00
1.25
1.33
94%(P4)




PSU21-3-007 J*
J* J* J* J*
J*
J*
J*
PSU21-3-008 J*
J*
J*
J*
J*

J*
J*
J*
PSU21-3-009 5.36
1.34 6.70 6.67 100% 100%
100% 100%
PSU21-3-010 2.63
0.32
2.95
3.68
80%(P4)



100%
PSU21-3-011 31.98
7.91
39.90
40.00
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
PSU21-3-012 0.50
0.13
0.63
1.33
48%

100%












UT21-3-001 8.50
1.27
9.77
13.90
70%

100%
94%

UT21-3-002 12.15
2.16
14.31
15.33
93%(P4)
100%
100%
100%

UT21-3-003 2.08
0.98
3.05
4.60
67%


67% (SI)

UT21-3-004 J*
J*
J*
J*
J*

J*
J*
J*
UT21-3-005 22.14
6.50
28.64
47.70
60%(P4)
98%
100%
100%
100%
UT21-3-006 15.93
7.58
23.51
33.90
69%(P4)

100%

89%
UT21-3-007 10.69
7.68
18.37
45.00
41%(P4)



99%
UT21-3-008 11.51
7.72
19.24
28.60
67%(P4)


100%
100%
UT21-3-010 38.15
5.95
44.10
50.0
88%(P4)



100%
UT21-3-011 7.08
1.75
8.83
13.00
68%(P4)

100%


UT21-3-013 6.67
1.15
7.82
7.30
107%

100%
100%

UT21-3-014 8.60
5.44
14.04
24.00
58%(P4)


100%
100%
UT21-3-015 2.50
1.18
3.68
3.30
111%

100%


UT21-3-016 2.00
0.43
2.43
2.50
97%
100%
100%


UT21-3-017 3.44
1.17
4.62
5.00
92%

100%
100%

UT21-3-018 6.42
1.95
8.37
8.00
105%


100%

UT21-3-019 0.42
0.08
0.50
0.50
100%
100%













HET21-3-100 118.25
37.35
155.6
157.5
99%
99%



HET21-3-201 6.22
1.29
7.52
9.50
79%(P4)

100%
100%
100%
HET21-3-203 0.92
0.18
1.10
4.00
28%(P4)
100%


100%
HET21-3-205 2.33
0.57
2.90
5.50
53%(P4)



100%
HET21-3-300 15.40
4.13
19.53
20.00
98%
100%
100%
100%











Joint prog:
UT21-3-004
PSU21-3-007
PSU21-3-008
63.05
10.85
73.89
78.68
94%(P4)

100%
100%
100%










J* = joint program between UT, PSU, and Munich - see summary at bottom of table
NT = no (or very late-in-trimester) targets submitted at this priority (even though time was allocated)
HC = HETDEX conflict (targets submitted were in direct competition with HETDEX; PI was aware of issue)
SI = Seasonally inappropriate (target had limited availability during trimester because of twilights)
TD = Time Domain targets (either none submitted or submitted targets unreachable due to weather)
P4 = Program's overall completion fraction is significantly impacted by the utilization of P4 time


Program Completion Rates
(sci only, removing NT/HC/TD)
Priority Average Completion Median Completion
P0 99.8% 100%
P1 100% 100%
P2 98.1% 100%
P3 95.0% 100%

NB great weather in the second half of the 21-3 trimester resulted in high completion rates for all priorities.



Completion trends by priority









Institution Status

Below we show how the TAC allocations were determined.

quantity
Aug
(hrs)
Sep
(hrs)
Oct
(hrs)
Nov
(hrs)
Total
(hrs)
18deg-18deg
243.93
268.10
306.58
318.17
1136.78
Weather loss frac. 0.432
0.513
0.391
0.369

Efficiency loss frac.
(align+PRs)
0.08
0.07
0.07
0.07

"Clear science" time
127.47
121.43
173.64
187.01
609.54
Com/Eng/GTO time




245.50
"Allowed" hours
given to TACs
for science




364.04




Partner
Share
Notes
Total hours
allowed
Goettingen
0.03860

14.05
Munich
0.05724

20.84
PSU
0.24897

90.64
UT
0.65518
-7.5h TESLA allocation
   per HET Board
231.01

TACs may allocate up to 8.3% at P0, 25% at P1, 33.3% at P2 and 33.3% at P3. P4 allocations are not restricted. GTO and engineering time are assigned by the HET board and not from this formula.


This is how each institution had allocated its time by priority:

Time Allocation by Institution (hours)

Institution Priority 0 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Total P0-P3
Frac. of allowed
Goettingen 1.20
3.50
4.70
4.70
-
14.10
100.4%
Munich 1.70
5.30
6.90
6.90
-
20.80
99.8%
PSU 6.60
21.33
30.50
30.50
14.80
88.93
98.1%
UT 19.75
57.80
76.33
77.75
127.00
231.63
100.3%
Other allocations
GTO 163.5 13.00 8.00 3.00
9.00
187.50
100.0%

Notes:
1) Allocations in joint programs are reported separately for each partner





The following is a summary of the total charged time for each institution based on our htopx data base (for shutter open) and night reports (for overhead). It includes shutter open time (weighting priority four by half) and overhead (no overhead for priority 4 observations). Recently this calculation was re-derived using a deficit/surplus model. For each financial year the share paid is compared with the time charged - any discrepancy between the two is tracked and carried forward as a deficit. A negative deficit means more time was observed for that partner than their financial share; a positive deficit means less time was observed. These deficits are calculated in each previous financial year; the table below also includes a preliminary total for the current financial year so far.

Accumulated deficits
for each partner


UT
PSU
M
G
total sci
hours
FY2015-2016

+4.6
-6.9
+1.1
+1.2
40.49
FY2016-2017

+22.7
-22.8
+0.8
-0.8
439.56
FY2017-2018

+37.7
-21.9
-14.7
-1.2
887.71
FY2018-2019

+43.0
-32.0
-10.8
-0.2
1401.17
FY2019-2020

+48.9
-48.4
+0.6
-1.1
2101.82
FY2020-2021

+25.1
-37.6
+13.8
-1.3
3095.70
FY2021-2022
(as of 1 Dec 2021)

+18.4
-34.0
+16.0
-0.5
3497.30
*Note that UT's deficit is decreasing and total deficits are <1% of total science hours.
NB: a more comprehensive annual partner fractional time charging analysis is produced separately from these trimester reports; a current copy can be provided upon request.



Below are the summaries of the Guaranteed Time Observations (GTO) programs granted by the Board:

GTO and Special Time Charged by Project (hours)
Project Allocated
in 21-3
Allocated total
to date
including 21-3
Charged
in 21-3
Charged total
to date
including 21-3
HETDEX (HETYY-P-100) 150.0 2314.0 148.1 1698.9
LRS2 GTO (HETYY-P-2XX) 8.0 183.9 8.8 109.9
HPF GTO (HETYY-P-3XX) 20.0 200.4 19.5
200.6
GW (HETYY-P-400) 0.0 70.0
0.0
12.4

(Totals to date start from the 11-2 period)








SJ, 5 Dec 2021