In this section we will discuss the status of the HET facility and each instrument and any limitation to configurations that occurred during the period.
LRS2-B |
LRS2-R |
VIRUS |
HPF |
HPF LFC |
HPF high-prec. |
Guider 1 |
Guider 2 |
WFS 1 |
WFS 2 |
DIMM |
122 |
122 |
122 |
122 |
122 |
121 |
122 | 122 | 122 | 122 | 122 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
99% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Commissioning, Engineering, and Guaranteed Time Report There were 220 hours granted in the 24-2 period:
There were 157.02 hours of eng/comm/GTO used (charged) in the 24-2 period, in the following categories:
Month by Month Summary
The following table gives the observing statistics for each month. Column A gives the fraction of the month that was spent attempting science (as opposed to engineering or instrument commissioning). Science time is defined to begin at 18 degree evening twilight and end at 18 degree morning twilight. Column B gives the fraction of the possible science time (A) lost due to weather. The other columns give the amount of remaining science time (after removing weather losses) not spent attempting science targets. Please note that the first stack of the night often occurs before 18 degree twilight.
Month | A: Fraction of the Time that was Possible Science |
B: Fraction of Total Time Lost due to Weather |
C: Fraction of Actual Science Time Spent with Shutter Open |
D: Fraction of Actual Science Time Lost due to Overhead |
E: Fraction of Actual Science Time Lost due to Alignment |
F: Fraction of Actual Science Time Lost due to Problems |
G: Fraction of Actual Science Time Not accounted for or Lost |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr | 0.993 |
0.452 |
0.695 |
0.277 |
0.0144 |
0.0132 |
0.0000 |
May | 0.967 |
0.278 |
0.682 |
0.271 |
0.0406 |
0.0063 |
0.0000 |
Jun | 1.000 |
0.350 |
0.647 |
0.243 |
0.0809 |
0.0291 |
0.0000 |
Jul | 0.998 |
0.355 |
0.631 |
0.296 |
0.0561 |
0.0164 |
0.0000 |
The following tables give a break down of all attempted science visits as well as the category that each falls into.
Charged exposures | ||
---|---|---|
Number of Times | Shutter Open (Hours) | Type |
3733 |
528.75 | A - Acceptable |
138 |
19.28 | B - Acceptable but Border line conditions |
661 |
144.28 |
4 - Priority 4 visits (does not include 1/2 charge) |
1 |
0.22 | Q - charged but PI error |
0 |
0.00 | C - Acceptable by RA but PI rejects |
Uncharged exposures caught by RA | ||
---|---|---|
Number of Times | Shutter Open (Hours) | Type |
1 |
0.17 | N - Rejected due to unknown cause |
5 |
1.53 | E - Rejected for Equipment Failure |
247 |
53.40 | W - Rejected for Weather |
7 |
2.18 | H - Rejected for Human Errors |
Uncharged exposures caught by PI | ||
---|---|---|
Number of Times | Shutter Open (Hours) | Type |
0 | 0.00 |
P - Rejected for weather |
0 | 0.00 |
F - Rejected for Equipment Failure |
0 |
0.00 |
T - Rejected for poor track choice |
0 |
0.00 |
X - Rejected for Human Errors |
Acceptable but Uncharged exposures | ||
---|---|---|
Number of Times | Shutter Open (Hours) | Type |
0 |
0.00 | I - Targets observed under otherwise idle conditions |
The following setup statistics include slew, acquisition, and starting data collection script. The table below gives the average setup time for each instrument PER ACTUAL VISIT and the average and maximum COMPLETED charged science exposures and visits.
The "Exposure" is defined by when the (CCD) shutter opens and closes. A "Visit" is the requested total CCD shutter open time during a track and might be made up of several "Exposures". "Visit" as defined here contains no overhead. To calculate one type of observing efficiency metric one might divide the "Visit" by the sum of "Visit" + "Overhead".
The average setup per visit is calculated from acceptable priority 0-3 (not borderline) science targets. This number reflects how quickly we can move from object to object on average for each instrument, however, this statistic tends to weight the setup
for programs with large number of targets.
The average overhead percentage is calculated for each instrument and shows how much of that instrument's total time on sky (overhead+exposure) was overhead. NB: LRS2 has the smallest overhead %, but typical LRS2 observations use much longer exposures than
VIRUS, even though VIRUS has a faster average setup time.
Instrument | Avg Setup per Visit (min) |
Total time exposed (hrs) |
Overhead % |
---|---|---|---|
VIRUS | 4.07 |
132.33 |
25.04% |
LRS2 | 6.13 |
36.85 |
35.14% |
HPF | 7.03 |
198.55 |
30.56% |
The setup statistics can be shortened by multiple setups (each one counted as a separate visit) while on the same target such as moving from LRS2-B to LRS2-R.
This calculation is temporarily unavailable for the 24-2 trimester. It may be able to be added retroactively in the future.
Overall time charged: 9.22h (eng) + 457.54h (sci/GTO) = 466.76h
Total estimated science time available (in TAC time determinations): 490.78h
Conclusion: the weather was consistent with past 2nd trimesters, and the estimate was only 4.9% too high. This was a typical trimester.
In the table below we show the breakdown of the charged time for each program submitted. The "Total %" is the completion of the entire TAC time including P4 time. The last four columns show the completion rate for targets submitted in each priority bin.
This completion rate is the greater of the targets completed percentage and the TAC allocation completed percentage in each priority bin.
Institution | Tot exp |
Tot OH |
Tot Chrg | Tot TAC | Total % | P0 Completion |
P1 Completion | P2 Completion | P3 Completion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G24-2-001 | 0.22 |
0.08 |
0.30 |
0.34 |
100% |
100% | |||
G24-2-002 | 8.00 |
2.19 |
10.19 |
11.16 |
91% |
100% |
100% |
67% | 100% |
G24-2-003 | J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
M24-2-002 | 2.63 |
0.83 |
3.45 |
3.50 |
98% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
M24-2-003 | J* | J* | J* | J* | J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
M24-2-004 | 2.67 |
2.03 |
4.70 |
4.00 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
||
M24-2-005 | 1.19 |
0.34 |
1.53 |
2.60 |
87% |
100% |
100% |
75% |
|
M24-2-006 | 1.00 |
0.25 |
1.25 |
5.00 |
25% |
100% |
0% |
0% |
|
M24-2-007 | 1.92 |
1.10 |
3.02 |
2.50 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
PSU24-2-001 | J* | J* | J* | J* | J* | J* | J* | J* | J* |
PSU24-2-002 | 1.05 |
0.00 |
1.05 |
3.25 |
57%(P4) |
||||
PSU24-2-003 | 2.28 |
0.34 |
2.62 |
3.67 |
75% |
100% |
50% |
||
PSU24-2-004 | 0.33 |
0.00 |
0.33 |
0.83 |
40%(P4) |
||||
PSU24-2-006 | J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
PSU24-2-007 | 0.30 |
0.12 |
0.42 |
0.55 |
100% |
100% |
|||
PSU24-2-008 | 1.29 |
0.00 |
1.29 |
1.75 |
73%(P4) |
||||
PSU24-2-009 | 2.77 |
0.45 |
3.22 |
3.02 |
100%(P4) |
100% |
|||
PSU24-2-010 | 0.69 |
0.00 |
0.69 |
2.00 |
34%(P4) |
||||
PSU24-2-011 | 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
2.00 |
0%(P4) |
||||
PSU24-2-012 | 7.95 |
2.79 |
10.74 |
10.28 |
100%(P4) |
100% |
|||
PSU24-2-013 | 7.08 |
1.98 |
9.05 |
8.67 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
PSU24-2-015 | 23.18 |
7.12 |
30.30 |
30.00 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
PSU24-2-016 | 0.01 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
2.00 |
0.4%(P4) |
0%(NT) |
|||
UT24-2-001 | 9.36 |
2.56 |
11.92 |
16.00 |
74% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
UT24-2-002 | 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
0% |
0%(TD) |
|||
UT24-2-003 | J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
UT24-2-004 | J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
J* |
UT24-2-006 | 5.50 |
1.97 |
7.47 |
7.5 |
99% |
100% |
100% |
||
UT24-2-007 | 3.33 |
0.50 |
3.83 |
4.00 |
95% |
100% |
|||
UT24-2-008 | 12.52 |
3.77 |
16.29 |
29.00 |
56%(P4) |
100% |
100% |
||
UT24-2-009 | 42.53 |
8.55 |
51.08 |
50.00 |
100%(P4) |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
UT24-2-010 | 6.33 |
1.50 |
7.83 |
8.00 |
97% |
100% |
|||
UT24-2-011 | 21.13 |
4.06 |
25.18 |
27.05 |
93%(P4) |
100% |
100% |
||
UT24-2-012 | 6.71 |
3.06 |
9.77 |
20.25 |
48%(P4) |
87% |
75% |
||
UT24-2-013 | 5.58 |
10.26 |
15.84 |
27.1 |
58%(P4) |
60% |
100% |
||
UT24-2-014 | 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.00 |
0% |
0%(NT) |
|||
UT24-2-015 | 0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
2.20 |
0% |
0%(NT) |
|||
UT24-2-016 | 1.40 |
1.21 |
2.61 |
1.70 |
100% |
100% |
|||
HET24-1-100 | 113.35 |
34.43 |
147.78 |
190.00 | 77% |
77% |
|||
UT24-1-003 +PSU24-2-001 +M24-2-003 +G24-2-003 |
9.17 |
1.68 |
10.85 |
11.00 |
98% |
100% |
|||
UT24-1-004 +PSU24-2-006 |
53.44 |
11.05 |
64.49 |
61.49 |
100%(P4) |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Program Completion Rates (sci only, removing NT/HC/SI/TD/DT) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority | Average Completion | Median Completion | Sci. hrs alloc. (UT+PSU+M+G) |
Sci. hrs obs. (%) |
P0 | 89% | 100% | 29.83 | 29.32 (97.9%) |
P1 | 97% |
100% | 59.08 | 58.98 (99.8%) |
P2 | 87% |
100% | 100.10 | 89.03 (88.9%) |
P3 | 91% | 100% | 85.35 |
88.98 (104.2%) |
Below we show how the TAC allocations were determined.
quantity |
Dec (hrs) |
Jan (hrs) |
Feb (hrs) |
Mar (hrs) |
Total (hrs) |
18deg-18deg |
248.20 |
224.58 |
199.88 |
215.15 |
887.71 |
Weather loss frac. | 0.39 |
0.38 |
0.44 |
0.47 |
|
Efficiency loss frac. (align+PRs) |
0.05 |
0.05 | 0.05 |
0.05 |
|
"Clear science" time |
142.32 |
130.89 |
105.22 |
103.14 |
490.78 |
Com/Eng/GTO time (estimated) |
175 |
||||
"Allowed" hours given to TACs for science |
315.78 |
Partner |
Share |
Time deficit correction |
Notes |
Total hours allowed |
Goettingen |
0.03860 |
+0.30 |
12.50 |
|
Munich |
0.05724 |
+1.50 |
19.60 |
|
PSU |
0.24897 |
-7.20 |
69.90 |
|
UT |
0.65518 |
+5.40 |
20h removed for TESLA |
181.6 |
This is how each institution had allocated its time by priority:
Time Allocation by Institution (hours) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Institution | Priority 0 | Priority 1 | Priority 2 | Priority 3 | Priority 4 | Total P0-P3 |
Frac. of allowed |
Goettingen | 1.70 |
2.40 |
4.20 |
4.20 |
0.00 |
12.50 |
100.0% |
Munich | 2.60 |
4.00 |
6.50 |
6.50 |
0.00 |
19.60 |
100.0% |
PSU | 10.02 |
13.28 |
23.80 |
23.80 |
14.08 |
70.90 |
100.0% |
UT | 25.71 |
39.40 |
65.60 |
50.85 |
71.25 |
181.56 |
98.7% |
Other allocations | |||||||
GTO | 190.00 |
- | - | - |
- |
190.00 |
Notes:
1) Allocations in joint programs are reported separately for each partner here
Accumulated deficits for each partner |
UT |
PSU |
M |
G |
total sci hours |
|
FY2015-2016 |
+4.6 |
-6.9 |
+1.1 |
+1.2 |
40.49 |
|
FY2016-2017 |
+22.7 |
-22.8 |
+0.8 |
-0.8 |
439.56 |
|
FY2017-2018 |
+37.7 |
-21.9 |
-14.7 |
-1.2 |
887.71 |
|
FY2018-2019 |
+43.0 |
-32.0 |
-10.8 |
-0.2 |
1401.17 |
|
FY2019-2020 |
+48.9 |
-48.4 |
+0.6 |
-1.1 |
2101.82 |
|
FY2020-2021
|
+25.1 |
-37.6 |
+13.8 |
-1.3 |
3095.70 |
|
FY2021-2022
|
+1.7 |
-19.0 |
+13.5 |
+3.8 |
4140.40 |
|
FY2022-2023 |
+8.9 |
-24.5 |
+11.5 |
+4.0 |
5197.99 |
|
FY2023-2024
|
-4.8 | -1.0 | +8.9 | -3.1 | 6335.85 |
|
percent of deficit: |
-0.08% |
-0.02% | +0.14% | -0.05% |
Below are the summaries of the Guaranteed Time Observations (GTO) programs granted by the Board:
GTO and Special Time Charged by Project (hours) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Project | Allocated in 24-1 |
Allocated total to date including 24-1 |
Charged in 24-1 |
Charged total to date including 24-1 |
HETDEX (HETYY-P-100) | 190.0 | 3629.0 | 147.8 |
+2799.5 |
SJ, updated 27 Apr 2024 with complete trimester information.